Like Atiku, like Shugaba Darman

April 15th, 2019

By Turaki Hassan

On January 24, 1980, in the heydays of the administration of the defunct National Party of Ni­geria (NPN), Nigerian immi­gration officers, acting on an order from the then Minister of Internal Affairs Bello Mai­tama, arrested and summar­ily deported the Borno State (Borno+Yobe then) House of Assembly Majority Leader, Alhaji Abdurahman Shugaba Darman to Chad Republic on the pretext that the government had discovered that he was not a Nigerian but a Chadian.

Alhaji Darman was a poli­tician of note and very charis­matic, a man who attracted and wowed large crowd at political rallies due to his oratory and stout criticism of the NPN re­gime. He was also a grassroots man and stalwart of the oppo­sition Great Nigerian Peoples Party (GNPP) and seen as the de factor governor, due to his influence in the government. The old Borno state was the stronghold of the GNPP while the federal government was controlled by NPN.

While Darman was cooling his heels in a Chadian village, his political party, the GNPP instituted a legal action, chal­lenging his illegal deporta­tion. In its defense, the feder­al government brought an old woman who claimed to be the mother of Alhaji Darman. The woman testified that she was the biological mother of Dar­man and wept profusely, claim­ing that she wanted her lost son back to his fatherland of Chad. In his defense, Darman denied ever knowing the woman, in­sisting that his mother was alive and lived in Maiduguri and was a well known person.

In the end, the court revoked Darman’s deportation order and even awarded to him, the sum of N350,000 damages. The government also lost the appeals in both Court of Ap­peal Kaduna and the Supreme Court.

The deportation, the court case and the drama that en­sued made Alhaji Darman a hero and popularized him, such that the case became au­thority in law -Shugaba Dar­man Vs Federal Government.

Almost 40 years after, the All Progressives Congress (APC) is threading the same igno­ble path. It appears that Nige­ria is the only country on earth where lessons are never learnt. APC’s submission to the Presi­dential Election Petition Tribu­nal that former Vice President and presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar is not a Nigerian, is laughable.

Atiku was born in Jada Ad­amawa state, did all his educa­tion in Nigerian schools, was in the Nigerian Customs Service for 20 years, until he retired as the second in command, was presidential aspirant of the de­funct Social Democratic Par­ty (SDP) in 1992, was elected governor in 1999, and was Vice President for eight years. For all the over 70 years he has lived in Nigeria, nobody, no one has ever raised issues with his citi­zenship until now and it came from a very unlike and unex­pected quarters-The APC-Ni­geria’s ruling party. Wonderful. If not that the APC stated this in a court filing, one will have taken it for a joke, even at that, a very expensive one.

Definitely, this is not a joke, it is a very very serious issue and maybe, a deportation order might have already been signed by Interior Minister Abdurah­man Danbazau, ordering that Alhaji Atiku Abubakar be de­ported to Cameroon. So, while he cools his heels there, his le­gal challenge of President Mu­hammadu Buhari’s election would be statute barred, as ar­gued by APC in the court filing.

Section 131 of the 1999 con­stitution provides for qualifi­cations to the position of the President which states that: “A person shall be qualified for election to the office of Presi­dent if he is a citizen of Nige­ria by birth.”

Thus, the APC is arguing that since Atiku is not a Nige­rian citizen by birth, he was not qualified to run for the office of the President of Nigeria and as such does not have the lo­cus standi to even challenge the results of the presidential elec­tion. Coming from the ruling party, this should not be taken lightly. Nigerians should give it all the needed attention be­cause what the APC is saying is that the area where Atiku came from is not part of Nigeria even as at today or they have limit­ed rights and privileges unlike the rest of us.

This is a very dangerous path that the party is threading- it is setting a negative and bad precedent which may eventu­ally lead to dismemberment of Nigeria.

The APC hinged its case on section 25 of the 1999 constitu­tion which deals with citizen­ship by birth. To be qualified to run for the office of a Gov­ernor or President one must be a citizen by birth while those who acquire their citizenship through naturalization can only contest for other posi­tions, other than the two men­tioned.

Section states that: “(1) The following persons are citizens of Nigeria by birth-namely-
(a) every person born in Nigeria before the date of in­dependence, either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents belongs or be­longed to a community indig­enous to Nigeria;
(b) Provided that a person shall not become a citizen of Nigeria by virtue of this sec­tion, if neither of his parents nor any of his grandparents was born in Nigeria.

(c) every person born in Nigeria after the date of in­dependence either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents is a citizen of Nigeria; and
(d) every person born out­side Nigeria either of whose parents is a citizen of Nigeria.

(2) In this section, “the date of independence” means the 1st day of October 1960.

Indeed, the framers or drafters of the 1999 consti­tution, which is a replica of the 1979 constitution, omit­ted the issue of citizenship by plebiscite. The 1963 constitu­tion captured but it was omit­ted in the 1979 and 1999 doc­uments. This is the lacuna the APC is capitalizing on to ad­vance its case.
“The man who saw tomor­row “

In the 7th Assembly, Hon Barrister Ibrahim Tukur El-Sudi, a one time Attorney General and Commission­er of Justice in Taraba state, sponsored a Constitution­al Amendment Bill to ad­dress this defect or lacuna. The bill scaled through and even got more than 2/3rd of votes from the states houses of assembly but unfortunate­ly former President Goodluck Jonathan refused to sign the entire amendment into law.

Honorable El-Sudi had then argued that one day a “busy-body may wake up “and deny them the right to run for the office of the pres­ident or even that of gover­nor of Taraba state and here we are today.

As at today, the areas af­fected include some parts of Cross Rivers state, four Lo­cal Governments in Adama­wa, five in Taraba and about six in Borno states. They were the places where the United Nations conducted the plebi­scite in 1961 and opted to be part of Nigeria while south­ern Cameroon voted to re­main in Cameroon.

Section 10 of the 1963 con­stitution clearly defined and recognized citizenship by plebiscite and accorded them all rights and privileges as cit­izens by birth under “Spe­cial Provisions as to North­ern Cameroons”. The section states thus: “For the purpose of determining the status of persons connected with the part of Northern Nigeria which was not included in the Federation on the thirty-first day of May, 1961, the forego­ing provisions of this Chapter and subsection (3) of section 17 of this Constitution shall have effect as if –
(a) for any reference to a particular date where there were substituted a reference to the last day of the period of eight months beginning with the day next following that date; and
(b) for any reference to the former Colony or Protector­ate of Nigeria (other than the second reference in section 7) there were substituted a refer­ence to the part aforesaid; and

(c) that other reference in­cluded a reference to the part aforesaid.

(2) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall prej­udice the status of any person who is or may become a citi­zen of Nigeria apart from that subsection.

Regrettably, APC is blind­ed by its quest for political power and is playing danger­ous politics with such a sen­sitive issue, not minding the grave consequences and the inherent dangers it portends. Unwittingly, what the ruling party seeks to do may open a gateway for dismemberment of Nigeria and secession of the Trust Territory from Ni­geria. Under the United Na­tions Charter, any plebiscite that is conducted must be duly registered with the UN for it to be recognized. Unfor­tunately, the 1961 plebiscite was never registered which legally and technically ren­dered it invalid.

If the courts rule in favour of the APC and shuts out Ati­ku, it will surely lead to agita­tions for secession from citi­zens of the affected areas and with the Ambazonia crisis in the English speaking Southern Cameroon raging, it will only be a matter of time before they align and join forces to chart a common future for themselves. APC is playing with wild fire.

Hassan, is the Special Ad­viser on Media & Public Af­fairs to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and can be reached on twitter via @turakies

Similar Post You May Like read more
Just In read more