News

Court slams Ghana High Commission for stealing land in Abuja

  • Tells IGP to order investigation

“I am taken aback as to how Ghana High Commission will be involved in such a scandalous and embarrassing situation…” Hon. Justice Y. Halilu

By Lillian Okenwa

Hon. Justice Y. Halilu of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court has ordered the investigation of circumstances leading to the theft of a property belonging to one Alhaji Zakari Jibrin by the Ghana High Commisiion in Abuja.

Delivering judgment in the matter brought by Jibrin suing through his Lawful Attorney Ahmed Suleiman, Halilu who directed the Nigeria Police and FCT Administration to promptly commence inquest stressed that: “…the how and manner Defendants came unto the subject matter be investigated.”

When Alhaji Zakari Jibrin received a letter notifying him of his success in a walk-in bid to purchase a Federal Government property in a high brow part of Abuja, little did he know that he was in for a most unpleasant legal battle with the Ghana High Commission. It was almost a pyrrhic victory.

The Committee on the sale of Federal Government Houses had put up the property for sale. Alhaji Jibrin put in his bid and was successful. Thereafter, he paid the purchase price of fifty eight million naira, after accepting the letter of offer from the Ad-hoc Committee on the Sale of Federal Government property under the auspices of the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCTA) for Plot 1000, Pope John Paul Street, Cadastral Zone A05, Maitama, Abuja.

When Jibrin concluded the transaction, he proceeded to take possession of the property only to discover that an unknown person who claimed to be landlord had let in tenants. On inquiring from the illegal occupants, he was informed that the ‘landlord’ one Mr. Nnaemeka Elobi, now deceased, had leased the property to Ghana High Commission. Promptly, Jibrin instructed his Counsel Messers Audu Karimu & Co., to write Elobi and Ghana High Commission asking them to vacate the property.

Following their refusal to vacate the property, Jibrin filed an action at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory. In their defence, Ghana High Commission (2nd Defendant) through their counsel Mr. Kenneth O. Gbagi, a former Minister of State for Education, claimed to have bought the property as a vacant land from Nnaemeka Elobi (1st Defendant) in 1989 for the sum of two hundred thousand naira, obtained the Certificate of Occupancy No. FCT/ABJ/AN/2457 dated 28th February, 1990, paid N4.5 million for drawing approval and constructed from 1989 to 1990.

Credit: Pexels.com

However, particulars of the Certificate of Occupancy in question was neither found in the records of Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) nor at the Abuja Geographical Information System (AGIS), the agencies responsible for keeping records of grants or titles in lands within the Federal Capital Territory.

In another breath, Gbagi who earlier claimed that his client bought the property from Nnaemeka Elobi (1st Defendant) wrote the Claimant’s lawyer noting that: “Our client who applied for a landed property to construct their residences, a property situated at House 30, Plot 1000, Pope John Paul II Street, Maitama, Abuja was allocated to the Ghana Government. The Ghana Government took appropriate steps to obtain building permits and constructed the aforesaid property for their own use.”

A perplexed Justice Halilu on sighting the letter which was marked Exhibit ‘A’ then asked: “Was the land in question allocated to Ghana Government by the FCT Minister? If yes, how then is the 2nd Defendant (Ghana High Commission) relying on an alleged purchase of the said land from one Nnaemeka Elobi now deceased… Where is the evidence of approval of building permits obtained…from the authorities…? Where are the approved drawings of the said property?

“It is instructive to state here that, in their respective pleadings and oral testimony of DW1, no building plan approval was tendered… Available records in the department indicate that there was no submission of building plan approval in respect of the above mentioned plot. It can easily be deduced from what played out that 1st defendant never had any land to have sold to the 2nd defendant… You can’t give what you don’t have.”

The court equally observed that the 1st defendant’s sole witness who deposed to the witness statement on oath, Richard Anim was never called to adopt the witness statement on oath in support of their defence.

“The Estate of the 1st Defendant who allegedly claimed it was allocated the said land with no such record found at the applicable land registry at the Federal Capital Development authority (FCDA) or Abuja Geographical Information System (AGIS) was missing in action. 2nd defendant which claimed to have bought the said land could not have had the support of the law…in the absence of registration of their interest pursuant to the extant provision of the law…

“They are at best meddlesome interlopers and mere busy bodies. Clearly, Defendants are squatters for all intents and purposes on the subject matter…”

After awarding the sum of twenty million naira as general damages against the defendants, the court went further to berate the Ghana High Commission.

“The 2nd Defendant is the Ghana High Commission. I am taken aback as to how Ghana High Commission will be involved in such a scandalous and embarrassing situation. Why and why would Ghana High Commission be speaking from both sides of its mouth on how it came about the subject matter i.e. land? this is so sad.

“Indeed the plight of the 2nd Defendant has been left in limbo to wither away as a judicial gate-crasher that has by provisions of law been consigned to a forlorn heap of legal fossil.

“I will recommend, and I hereby recommend that the how and manner Defendants came unto the subject matter be investigated by the Nigerian Police and authorities of the FCT Administration…”

Speaking after the court session, Mr. Moses Ebute SAN, who led Ibrahim Idris and Mayowa Ajileye said: “This case has further exposed the hydra headed  problems and unholy dealings or practices perpetuated by land syndicates  that  has  characterized land acquisition process in the Federal Capital Territory over the years. What is more worrisome is the fact that it has attained an international flavour.”

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This News Site uses cookies to improve reading experience. We assume this is OK but if not, please do opt-out. Accept Read More