By Daniel Tyokua
The Senate Committee on the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Tuesday, came down hard on the contractor handling Karshi – Ara and extension of Karshi – Apo – road, over failure to complete the project within the stipulated time.
Chairman of the committee, Smart Adeyemi, who led his colleagues and Ministers of the FCT on oversight function, said it was a shame for an indigenous construction company to betray the trust of FCT Administration and the National Assembly, by awarding the contract to the firm.
The Apo -Karshi road project was awarded to M/S Kakatar’ CE . Big. Limited in 2011, at N6, 355, 609, 124. 53with the completion period of 20 months, which eleven years after there is no hope for when the project will be completed.
He said the company had acknowledged the full funding of the project by the current FCT Administration, and there was no reason for the firm to depend on excuses instead of delivering the work as scheduled.
Adeyemi regretted that a contract that was awarded in 2011 has not been completed for several years, which he described as a failure.
According to him, Apo -Karshi road always appear in FCT budget and was giving the Senate headache, which must be looked into.
He asked the contractor to appear before the Senate for explanation next week Thursday.
“If I submit the budget before the floor of the National Assembly my colleagues we take me up on it, they we be asking questions and I don’t want to be confused.
“You should be a shame of yourself and the company, the fund has been provided for the work, why excuse again?
“I remember when this job started and I had cost to come here in either 2013 or 2014, you gave us the same promise.when an indigenous company betray the trust, you justify why local firms should not be patronage.
“If I am the minister I will revoke this job, and ask them to refund the government, if you can’t do the job why should you accept it ? There is no reason again to continue with the company.
The chief site engineer, Ezekiel Panam who spoke on behalf of the Managing Director, said the delay in the project was due to the increase in price of items.
According to him, the project was awarded in 2011 when the prices of materials were not high.
“No administration has funded this project as the current one has done, part of the delay was funding but since you came on board you settled it. This job was awarded in 2011, now prices of materials are not the same, so we are trying our best to deliver”
