Cover

Presidential/National Assembly Elections in Nigeria: EU observers decry process, saying elections held on schedule, but lacks transparency

From Cyriacus Nnaji, Lagos

European Union Election Observation Mission has stated that the Presidential and National Assembly Elections conducted on the 25th February, 2023 in Nigeria is lacking in transparency.

The group stated that even though the elections commenced as scheduled, it lack transparency and operational failures which reduced trust in the process and therefore called on the electoral body, the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) to address issues that emanated before, during and after the election.

The Mission made the disclosures in a press statement on 27th February, 2023 in what they called First Preliminary Statement on the Elections.

The group said “On 25 February, Nigerians went to the polls in highly anticipated Presidential and National Assembly elections that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) kept on schedule despite a volatile and challenging environment. Fundamental freedoms of assembly and movement were largely respected, yet the full enjoyment of the latter was impeded by insufficient planning, insecurity and the prevailing Naira and fuel shortages.”

The Mission said that there was an obvious abuse of power of incumbency by office holders “Abuse of incumbency by various political office holders distorted the playing field and there were widespread allegations of vote buying.

“Media provided an extensive coverage of the three leading campaigns, while disinformation interfered with voters’ right to make an informed choice on election-day,” the group added.

The mission maintained that INEC’s operational capacity was also hampered by the ongoing fuel and Naira shortage “The EU EOM is continuing its observation of the ongoing collation and tabulation of results throughout the country. INEC’s operational capacity was hampered by the ongoing fuel and Naira shortage. Insecurity prevented it from accessing some Local Government Areas (LGAs), notably in the South. Attacks on INEC premises, including just days before polling, hindered preparations in affected areas, while instilling fear in voters.”

It stated that INEC lacked efficient planning and transparency during critical stages of the electoral process, while on election-day trust in INEC was seen to further reduce due to delayed polling processes and information gaps related to the much anticipated access to results on its Results Viewing Portal (IReV).

Reviewing events leading to the election, the group stated “In the lead-up to elections, the widely welcomed Electoral Act 2022 introduced measures aimed at building stakeholder trust, however leaving some important gaps in terms of accountability and INEC’s power to enforce the law. Weak points include a lack of INEC empowerment to enforce sanctions for electoral offences and breaches of campaign finance rules. Positively, INEC benefited from timely financing than for previous contests. Other new provisions also aimed to enhance transparency of results.

“The introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the IReV for the 2023 elections was perceived as an important step to ensure the integrity and credibility of elections. However, delayed training of technical personnel, an inadequate mock testing exercise, and a lack of public information on the election technologies diminished expectations and left room for speculation and uncertainty.

“During the early stages of collation, presidential result forms from polling units were not displayed on the IReV, while Senate and House of Representative results were slowly published. Presidential election result forms started to be uploaded after 10 pm on election-day, raising concerns and reaching only 20 per cent by noon on 26 February. Later the same evening, INEC explained the delay with “technical hitches,”’ the Mission stated.

The EU Mission said among 93.4 million registered voters, 9.5 million additional voters were registered ahead of the 2023 polls, of whom two-thirds were youth following mobilisation efforts during the registration period. Yet, the collection of permanent voter cards (PVC), a requirement to vote, was negatively affected by poor institutional planning. Two days before elections, INEC stated that 93.3 per cent of PVCs were collected. Without an independent audit of the voter register, quality and inclusiveness could not be assured. Following contentious candidate registration processes there were18 contestants for the presidential office and over 4200 for 461 national assembly seats. They were selected in party primaries that reportedly lacked transparency and inclusiveness, marked by very chronically low levels of participation of women and youth. This compounded an overall stark lack of legal measures for inclusion and barriers to participation which do not align with international standards.

The conduct of contesting parties and candidates, as well as some gaps in the law, led to a spate of pre-election court cases, with some matters not finalised ahead of elections. During the pre-election period, EU EOM interlocutors criticised various court rulings for being too technical, some leading to belated primary re-runs, others to substitutions of perceived legitimate candidates, thereby eroding public trust, exposing intra-party conflicts, and contributing to a volatile campaign environment. The campaign was highly competitive, and contestants conducted rallies nationwide, but the Naira cash and fuel scarcity reduced activities and attendance. Political parties denounced unequal campaign conditions due to interference of opponent governors.

Reports of vote and PVC buying were also frequent. Internal party conflicts weakened the presidential campaigns of PDP and APC with personal accusation obscuring issue-based messages shortly before the elections. There was a lack of prosecution of electoral offences and a significant increase in violent incidents closer to elections, including attacks on candidates, reportedly, aimed to disturb the elections and suppress voter participation, particularly in the South-East. Media offered an extensive campaign coverage, despite economic hardships, institutional pressures, and electoral violence.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This News Site uses cookies to improve reading experience. We assume this is OK but if not, please do opt-out. Accept Read More