News

Groups fault Soyinka’s comment, say tight security for Seyi Tinubu justified, not political

Two civic organisations, operating under the umbrella of the Grassroots Mobilisation Initiative (GMI) and the Democracy Watch Initiative (DWI), have issued a joint response to recent remarks by Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, regarding the security detail attached to Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

The groups noted that Seyi Tinubu had previously come under attack during the charged political atmosphere preceding the 2023 party primaries, an incident they said underscored the genuine threats that accompany his public visibility and influence.

In a statement jointly endorsed by GMI’s National Coordinator, Samaila Musa, and DWI’s Director of Strategic Communications, Dr. Tunji O. Bamidele, the organisations argued that Seyi Tinubu’s status as the first son of a sitting president naturally subjects him to heightened scrutiny and, at times, hostility.

According to the statement: “We hold Professor Soyinka in high regard for his contributions to literature and his advocacy for justice, we believe that his comments on this matter merit a thoughtful and reasoned rebuttal.

“Professor Soyinka’s critique appears to stem from a perspective that overlooks the unique circumstances surrounding Seyi Tinubu’s public life and the potential threats he faces.”

The groups emphasised Seyi Tinubu’s sustained interactions with young Nigerians, his involvement in youth-focused initiatives, and his efforts to expand opportunities for everyday young people. While these engagements have strengthened his influence, they said, they have also increased his exposure to risks.

GMI and DWI urged Soyinka to refrain from politicising issues of personal safety, warning that his remarks could unintentionally diminish the seriousness of the threats individuals like Seyi Tinubu encounter.

“In a nation where political tensions and violence can escalate rapidly, it is imperative to recognize the need for adequate security measures for individuals in high-profile positions and especially members of the first family whenever the need arises.

“Seyi Tinubu has not only embraced his role as a public figure but has also actively engaged with the youth of Nigeria, advocating for their interests and facilitating appointments that resonate with their aspirations.

“His commitment to youth empowerment and involvement in advocating for ordinary Nigerian youths has positioned him as a pivotal figure in the current administration, a role that, regrettably, also heightens his vulnerability.

“It is essential to emphasize that the provision of security for Seyi Tinubu is not merely a matter of privilege; it is a necessary precaution to ensure his safety and well-being. In a society where political violence is not uncommon, the protection of individuals who are influential in shaping the future of the nation must be prioritized.

“To dismiss the need for such protection is to disregard the realities of our political landscape and the potential dangers that accompany public service. Furthermore, we urge Professor Soyinka to refrain from politicizing issues of security and safety.

“The implications of his remarks could inadvertently undermine the seriousness of the threats faced by individuals like Seyi Tinubu. While it is crucial to engage in healthy political discourse, it is equally important to approach matters of personal safety with the gravity they deserve knowing fully well the security situation in Nigeria for the past twenty years can not be compared with other claims that Professor Soyinka was trying to reference.”

“Security is not a luxury; it is a fundamental right that should be afforded to all citizens, especially those who have chosen to serve their country in the public eye. The Grassroots Mobilisation Initiative and Democracy Watch Initiative stands firm in our belief that Seyi Tinubu, given his unique position and the challenges he faces, is deserving of police protection,” the statement read.

Reiterating their position, the groups maintained that Seyi Tinubu’s circumstances justify the security provided to him. They encouraged all stakeholders, including Soyinka, to prioritise safety above political disagreements.

They added: “Let us move beyond political rhetoric and work together to ensure a secure environment for all Nigerians, regardless of their political affiliations or familial ties.”

Related Posts

This News Site uses cookies to improve reading experience. We assume this is OK but if not, please do opt-out. Accept Read More