A suit filed against Senator Iyabo Obasanjo and others over an Abuja property dispute, on Monday, suffered setback as no lawyer appeared at the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were represented before Justice Mohammed Umar in the case, which was on number seven on the day’s cause list.
The matter was consequently fixed for March 30 for further mention.
When the case came up on October 2, 2025, hearing could not proceed.
Counsel for the plaintiffs, Abniyilo Na’allah, had sought an adjournment following the inability to serve the defendants in the suit as no lawyer appeared for the defence.
The plaintiffs; ABB Electrical Systems Limited and Ambassador Yohana Margif, had dragged Obasanjo and other co-defendants to court over dispute on a landed property.
The property is located at Plot 4254, Cadastral Zone A04, measuring approximately 1.67 hectares in highbrow Asokoro District in Abuja.
Other defendants in the suit are the former Senator representing the FCT, Philip Aduda; Ismail Iron; Senator John Mbata; Jamaila Sani Alhassan; Altine Jibrin, and some unknown persons as 2nd to 7th defendants respectfully.
The case was formerly before Justice Inyang Ekwo.
Justice Ekwo had, on January 28, 2025, refused to grant the the ex-parte motion filed by the plaintiffs after it was moved by Na’allah.
The applicants had sought an order of interim injunction restraining the defendants/respondents from entering, trespassing, altering or modifying the property belonging to the plaintiffs pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
The judge, instead, directed the plaintiffs to put the defendants on notice in order to hear from them why the prayer should not be granted.
The plaintiffs had filed the motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/67/2025 dated January 13 but filed January 17 by Na’allah.
In their six-ground argument, the applicants said they feared that the defendants could trespass or alter their property.
They said they were the rightful owners of the land by virtue of the statutory Right of Occupancy granted to them.
“That the plaintiffs/applicants have been in quiet and peaceful possession of the land without any challenge from the defendants/respondents or anyone at all.
“It will occasion serious miscarriage of justice against the plaintiffs/applicants if the defendants/respondents are allowed to tamper with, enter, trespass, alter or modify the property belonging to the plaintiffs.
“Allowing the defendants/respondents to tamper with, enter, trespass, alter or modify the property belonging to the plaintiffs will destroy the res and render the judgment of this court nugatory,” they said.
The applicants said irreparable damage would be caused to them if the defendants were not restrained.
Margif, in the affidavit he deposed to, stated that the company (1st plaintiff) was allocated the parcel of land by the Federal Capital Development Adminstration (FCDA) covered by a Statutory Right of Occupancy with new issued date of May 23, 2006.
He said the company intended to start developing the said land in compliance with terms contained on the statutory Right of Occupancy and other guiding rules and laws within the FCT.
He alleged that the recent activities of the defendants, including Sen. Obasanjo, who represented Ogun Central Senatorial District between 2007 and 2011, had become worrisome.
Margif prayed the court to grant their application in the interest of justice.
