News

How S’Court Justice predicted judgment on petition against Tinubu – Lawyer

A seasoned legal practitioner, Dr Jezie Ekejiuba, believes that “Justice John Inyang Okoro of the Supreme Court of Nigeria has already prematurely delivered Judgment on President Bola Tinubu’s certificate forgery allegation by Alhaji Atiku Abubakar vide CSU Deposition Oath by his judicial comments during the hearing of the appeal last Monday.

He pointedly said that the issue involved is a Criminal matter which must be proved beyond all reasonable doubt, and observed that there exist before the court two letters from the same university, CSU, one letter authenticating Tinubu’s Certificate (positive) and the other letter discrediting his certificate (negative),” Ekejiuba said in a WhatsApp statement made available to News Express yesterday, Wednesday, October 25.

He noted that “Proof beyond all reasonable doubt in legal parlance means proof without any iota of doubt”, adding: “When two letters contradict each other, certainly, this is not a minor doubt but a major doubt. In criminal matters even a minor doubt is enough to free the accused person and he or she will stand discharged from the alleged criminal offence.

“One does not need to be a lawyer to predict that the Judgment on the Tinubu Certificate forgery saga has already been delivered ahead of the Judgment Day.

“Both comments by the two Supreme Court judges, Justice Okoro and Justice Agim were “judgment writing” at the hearing stage,” he said.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This News Site uses cookies to improve reading experience. We assume this is OK but if not, please do opt-out. Accept Read More